Is eating meat objectively wrong?
To answer this we have to know what objectively
means. Let’s start by pointing out that objective is understood as the opposite
of subjective. Subjective basically means one person’s point of view.
So when we ask is it wrong to eat
meat we can’t just go ask a dude or a gal because then our answer would only be
subjective. Consider that said dude and gal may have different answers.
Things are getting tricky.
So how on earth can we know if
something is objectively wrong or right if we can’t ask anybody? How can we
know anything if we can’t ask anybody?
Don’t panic.
There are some, oh let us call
them, for the moment, factoids that we consider to be true without asking
anybody.
Like 2+2=4.
We don’t need Dude or Gal’s input
here or anyone’s input. We don’t even need anyone to exist. If the dinosaurs
hadn’t gone extinct and they’d opened up coffee shops and we kooky humans never
existed, 2+2=4 would still be true. Right?
For now, yes.
But let us consider this “never
existed” bit, because this is actually a good way to think about objectivity. Whenever
asking if anything is objectively true or right or moral we can ask, even if people
didn’t exist _____ .
Let’s try it:
Even if people didn’t exist, eating
meat would be wrong.
*Cogitates*
So lions are morally in the wrong
when they eat meat?
The Venus Flytrap?
Hmmm.
Maybe we need to instead ask is it
objectively wrong for people to eat
meat.
People may or may not be the worst
but some do eat wurst, so we do need to know whether or not it is objectively
wrong for them to do so.
How can we get “people eating meat
is wrong” to seem like 2+2=4?
All the while minding our even if humans didn’t exist rule, ok
fine, guideline.
Wait,
How can we talk about people eating
meat while thinking about them not existing?
People are meat so we always, necessarily, have both at the same time. One can't be construed without the other.
This is getting weird.
It's getting meta...
wait for it...
OMG meta is an anagram of meat!
Do you know what this means?!?!?
No comments:
Post a Comment