Showing posts with label facticity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label facticity. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 2, 2024

Line of Work

On my commute this morning, I saw a company truck for

https://www.tcsco2.com/


"We put the fizz in your bizz."

Did you ever stop and wonder about how you got into your line of work?

Did you ever stop and wonder about all the accidents and possible paths that landed you in your line of work and not some other? 

I was working at a Kmart when I decided to go back to school (and accrue more debt) for Counselor Ed. Somehow I got a GA gig in Judiciaries (somehow = I had a good interview and a good recommendation) which led to a job in Judiciaries, then a College of Medicine, then Arts & Sciences, then to Rhode Island and a somewhat stable career in Higher Ed. 

But I am fully aware that all this, ALL THIS, was tenuous, and that it DIDNT HAVE TO BE. 

Does that ever scare you? 

How could it have turned out? 

Poorer? Happier? More fulfilled? Richer? 

So many moments seem like fulcrums that could have changed things irreparably. 

Does that ever scare you?

Or is it just me that thinks about such things? 

It's probably me.

It's me. 



Monday, October 30, 2017

Who Gave Us Modernity? Becasue I Want My Money Back.



I need to invent a word to capture the something like irony, something like paradox, something like paradigm-less superimposition, radical objectivity meets facticity and both lose, feelings/ideas I had reading Betraying Spinoza: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity.

As someone who feels like he is fighting his history and facticity, like Rebecca Goldstein feels Spinoza did on some level, but with the hope that there is some intellectual/rational solution to my facticity, as Spinoza ultimately felt there was to his own, via his radical objectivity (pantheism),...
I…
have my doubts.

Just can’t help thinking that happiness can’t be derived from a priori knowledge like 2+2=4. 

Human, all too human I guess.

Re the subtitle: The Renegade Jew Who Gave Us Modernity.
Historians like Stephen Greenblatt, author of The Swerve, might offer that Spinoza played a part in modernity but that it began with Lucretius.
After all, modernity is time sensitive, by definition.
Rationality isn’t time sensitive though.
Or is it…
(cue ominous music)




Thursday, November 17, 2016

Heidegger And The Bottle




I found myself oddly thinking about Heidegger last night as I gave a bottle to my little guy in the darkness of his room with the noise machine on, my eyes closed.
I thought about how Heidegger was an ontologist, studying Being, and how, like Descartes, he deduced a baseline, a fixed point, a north star if you will from which he could find his way.
Every freshman philosophy major will indeed be slack-jawed, rapt when they read Descartes’ Meditations and marvel at his fixed point – the cogito, deduced amid the hyperbolic doubt he so deftly describes. (Look at me, alliterating like a beatnik! (Thank you Captain Holt)).
Heidegger found his fixed point through phenomenological analysis:
In studying Being, this study begins from an individual being – the wondrous, beautiful, mean-what-we-say-say-what-we-mean german term Dasein…a being there. This being there is YOU!
This term is so packed and dense it is sublime. As a being there you are subject to a time, subject to a place and you were not free to choose the time or the place (time and place is the umwelt – the world around). This lack of freedom is something Heidegger called facticity – the inescapable accidents of your existence, like being born in 1970, in Ohio... and also you are not merely in the world, you are thrown into the world – another great german word: geworfenheit.
However, working through Sein und Zeit, one learns that after being thrown into the world, you freely choose your future, you freely choose your time and place but always in the light of historical constraints. You can be authentic while recognizing your facticity.
What occupied my mind the most was remembering the idea that with each choice we make, an infinite number of available choices become possible. Turn to your left and a whole new world is possible, turn to your right, the same. This may sound inane but consider your life: Did you follow your bliss? Did you become a success? Did you fail? Did you…?
Here’s the thing, it is not only the new world that opens with every choice, this is not the only thing that makes you up, because with each choice you make, other worlds and other choices are no longer possible.
Do you see it now? The fragility of the future, the past, the present? This is why the existentialists harped on authenticity. You should be authentic and follow your bliss because this world is tenuous my man, fleeting AF.
And here is where it got weird (er). I thought about the election. And all the possible worlds that will no longer be possible. And I felt fragile and as the parent I never thought I would be, I felt the fragility not just for me but for the little guy in my lap taking the bottle, and for his big brother trying to get to sleep upstairs.

I slept ok but I would be lying if I told you I’ve felt this way before…I have not. And I am 46, I have been through a few elections.

Featured Post

In The Static

He had about 4 hours and 30 minutes. He, like Jack London, was going to use his time. What else did a man have…but time? Christians hav...