Showing posts with label brittney spears. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brittney spears. Show all posts

Friday, November 2, 2018

If You Gotta Ask..

Remember when I wrote about art here and asked what is the process that is necessary and sufficient for someone to be called an artist? 

Then I read this (and these lines... 

When you’re truly creating you don’t have time to think about what to call it.
Who thinks of what they’ll name the baby while they’re fucking?
&
Too many musicians and not enough artists.
&
You can’t practice art.
In order for it to be true, one must live it.)

On Why Jazz Isn’t Cool Anymore . . . .
Posted on November 27, 2011 
Jazz died in 1959.
There maybe cool individuals who say they play Jazz, but ain’t shit cool about Jazz as a whole.
Jazz died when cool stopped being hip.
Jazz was a limited idea to begin with.
Jazz is a label that was forced upon the musicians.
The musicians should’ve never accepted that idea.
Jazz ain’t shit.
Jazz is incestuous.
Jazz separated itself from American popular music.
Big mistake.
The music never recovered.
Ornette tried to save Jazz from itself by taking the music back to its New Orleanian roots, but his efforts were too esoteric.
Jazz died in 1959, that’s why Ornette tried to “Free Jazz” in 1960.
Jazz is only cool if you don’t actually play it for a living.
Jazz musicians have accepted the idea that it’s OK to be poor.
John Coltrane is a bad cat, but Jazz stopped being cool in 1959.
The very fact that so many people are holding on to this idea of what Jazz is supposed to be is exactly what makes it not cool.
People are holding on to an idea that died long ago.
Jazz, like the Buddha, is dead.
Let it go, people, let it go.
Paul Whiteman was the King of Jazz and someday all kings must fall.
Jazz ain’t cool, it’s cold, like necrophilia.
Stop fucking the dead and embrace the living.
Jazz worries way too much about itself for it to be cool.
Jazz died in 1959.
The number one Jazz record is Miles Davis’ Kind Of Blue.
Dave Brubeck’s Time Out was released in 1959.
1959 was the coolest year in Jazz.
Jazz is haunted by its own hungry ghosts.
Let it die.
You can be martyrs for an idea that died over a half a century if y’all want.
Jazz has proven itself to be limited, and therefore, not cool.
Lot’s wife turned to a pillar of salt from looking back.
Jazz is dead.
Miles ahead.
Some may say that I’m no longer the same dude who recorded the album with Doc Cheatham.
Correct: I’m not the same dude I was 14 years ago.
Isn’t that the point?
Our whole purpose on this planet is to evolve.
The Golden Age of Jazz is gone.
Let it go.
Too many necrophiliacs in Jazz.
You’re making my case for me.
Some people may say we are defined by our limitations.
I don’t believe in limitations, but yes, if you believe you are limited that will define you.
Definitions are retrospective.
And if you find yourself getting mad, it’s probably because you know Jazz is dead.
Why get upset if what I’m saying doesn’t ring true?
I can’t speak for anyone else, but I don’t play Jazz.
I play Postmodern New Orleans music.
Louis Armstrong and Danny Barker play Traditional New Orleans Music.
Ellis Marsalis and James Black play Modern New Orleans music.
Kidd Jordan and Clyde Kerr play Avant-garde New Orleans music.
Donald Harrison plays Neoclassical New Orleans music.
I play Postmodern New Orleans music.
I am a part of a lineage.
I am a part of a blood line.
My ancestors didn’t play Jazz, they played Traditional, Modern and Avant-garde New Orleans Music.
I don’t play Jazz.
I don’t let others define who I am.
I am a Postmodern New Orleans musician.
I create music for the heart and the head, for the beauty and the booty.
The man who lets others define him is a dead man.
With all due respect to the masters, they were victims of a colonialist mentality.
Blacks have been conditioned for centuries to be grateful for whatever crumbs thrown to them.
As a postmodern musician, it’s my duty to do better than my predecessors.
To question, reexamine and redefine what it is that we do.
They accepted it because they had to.
Because my ancestors opened the door for me, I don’t have to accept it.
Louis bowed and scraped so Miles could turn his back.
It’s called evolution.
It’s the colonialist mentality that glorifies being treated like a slave.
There is nothing romantic about poor, scuffling Jazz musicians.
Fuck that idea.
It’s not cool.
Jazz is a lie.
America is a lie.
Playing Jazz is like running on a treadmill: you may break a sweat, but ultimately you ain’t going nowhere.
Some people may say we are limited.
I say, we are as limited as we think.
I am not limited.
Jazz is a marketing ploy that serves an elite few.
The elite make all the money while they tell the true artists it’s cool to be broke.
Occupy Jazz!
I am not speaking of so-called Jazz’s improvisational aspects.
Improvisation by its very nature can never be passé, but mindsets are invariably deadly.
Not knowing is the most you can ever know.
It’s only when you don’t know that “everything” is possible.
Jazz has nothing to do with music or being cool.
It’s a marketing idea.
A glaring example of what’s wrong with Jazz is how people fight over it.
People are too afraid to let go of a name that is killing the spirit of the music.
Life is bigger than music, unless you love and/or play Jazz.
The art, or lack thereof, is just a reflection.
Miles Davis personified cool and he hated Jazz.
What is Jazz anyway?
Life isn’t linear, it’s concentric.
When you’re truly creating you don’t have time to think about what to call it.
Who thinks of what they’ll name the baby while they’re fucking?
Playing Jazz is like using the rear-view mirror to drive your car on the freeway.
If you think Jazz is a style of music, you’ll never begin to understand.
It’s ultimately on the musicians.
People are fickle and follow the pack.
Not enough artists willing to soldier for their shit.
People follow trends and brands.
So do musicians, sadly.
Jazz is a brand.
Jazz ain’t music, it’s marketing, and bad marketing at that.
It has never been, nor will it ever be, music.
Here lies Jazz (1916 – 1959).
Too many musicians and not enough artists.
I believe music to be more of a medium than a brand.
Silence is music, too.
You can’t practice art.
In order for it to be true, one must live it.
Existence is not contingent upon thought.
It’s where you choose to put silence that makes sound music.
Sound and silence equals music.
Sometimes when I’m soloing, I don’t play shit.
I just move blocks of silence around.
The notes are an afterthought.
Silence is what makes music sexy.
Silence is cool.

- Nicholas Payton


Friday, September 23, 2016

Converastion With Das Man


What’s on my mind lately?
“Got my mind on my money and my money on my mind.”

Not really, I don’t’ have any money.
What is on my mind lately?
I turned 46 September 21st.
4 years away from being 50. I majored in math.
Ran 3 miles this morning in 23:45. But on a treadmill so not exactly an 8:00 clip.
Still not bad considering I am 46 and that a substantial number of people never exercise.
Never?
Never.
But I still feel that a substantial number of those never-exercisers are better than me.
Das Man: Why?
They make money.
Das Man: Why is money the measure of a man?
Society tells me?
Das Man: Society tells you Brittney Spears is a musician, old people are worthless, and that the best way to sell a burger is hinting at a threesome. 

Das Man: Why would you listen to society?
The volume?
Das Man: Turn it down.
How?
Das Man: Put your attention elsewhere.
Is this the part where you tell me my worth isn’t measured by dollars or yearly salary or material wealth and that if I just focus on my worth in terms of warm relationships and strong interpersonal bonds, that I’ll find my value is high?
Das Man: No, your value is still low because you don’t have warm relationships and strong interpersonal bonds because you’ve been too busy being bitter about your fiduciary fuck-up-edness to invest in relationships. I think they call this a vicious cycle.
Is that some sort of new spinning cycle? Will it allow me to work out so hard I forget about being a worthless piece of shit?
Das Man: It depends.
On?
Das Man: How much you listen to society body shaming you into worthlessness if you aren’t’ ripped with triceps for days and pectorals that peak and abs you can wash clothes on.
Seems like society doesn’t want me to be happy.
Das Man: Society is inanimate, it doesn’t “want” anything. 
The better question is what do you want?
A threesome.

Monday, March 2, 2015

Thinking About Thinking About Birdman



Thinking About Thinking About Birdman

Of course you’ll notice the “meta” in the title to this blog. For those of you who have not seen Birdman, this refers to the fact that the movie evolves around actors in a play, ergo, the acting about the acting.

Now to be honest, this movie did not get my full attention because I have a 3 year old and an 11 month old so 2 hours to do anything without interruption is 1. Rare and 2. If it does happen, it happens later in the evening and this blogger gets up at 4:45am everyday so in-depth analysis of a movie at night is low on the priority list. 

Translation: I fell asleep. 

However, I watched the end (last 15 minutes) the next day and came away with the following:

The movie would be great for an undergraduate aesthetics class as it asks the question, “What is art?” And, for me, the movie delves into this further by asking, what is the process that is necessary and sufficient for someone to be called an artist? 

Ask yourself if you think the music of Britney Spears qualifies as art. Most of us don’t really think so and if you massage the idea a little bit you find that the answer is that because she doesn’t really “bleed” for it, unlike those artists we know that do bleed, and do so in obscurity, for a long time.

Now ask yourself why we have this prereq that the artist bleeds. Why can’t there be artists that are genuine and authentic, yet the art comes easy for them. That seems to rub us the wrong way. Why?

In the movie, Michael Keaton bleeds, literally and figuratively, for his art but is seen as the talentless action hero from his days past as Birdman. The antithesis is Ed Norton, who is shallow, pretentious, and phony but has critical success. 

There are subplots and sub characters that all serve to drive the essentials questions of what is art and who can be called an artist. The movie does a wonderful job making you think about possible answers.

What qualifies as art and who qualifies as an artist?


Featured Post

In The Static

He had about 4 hours and 30 minutes. He, like Jack London, was going to use his time. What else did a man have…but time? Christians hav...